Pew at IWC62, Agadir, Morocco, 21st to 25th June, 2010
International Whaling Commission fails to find a way forward for whales
Agadir, Morocco – 23 June, 2010
Dr Susan Lieberman, director of international policy for the Pew Environment Group, issued the following statement today in response the International Whaling Commission’s (IWC) Annual Meeting concluding without any results from the three-year effort to reconcile the impasse between pro-whaling and anti-whaling countries.
“We are deeply disappointed that the governments present here, after more than 3 years of intense work, could not reach a solution that will benefit whale conservation. In particular, the lack of sufficient flexibility shown by Japan to phase out its whaling in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary prevented a decision from being adopted. Continuation of the impasse here may retain the whaling moratorium on paper, but unregulated whaling outside of IWC control, by Japan, Norway, and Iceland, will now be able to continue".
Joint statement by Greenpeace, Pew and WWF at the opening of the annual meeting of the IWC
Agadir – 21 June, 2010
WWF, Greenpeace and the Pew Environment Group believe that the IWC's commercial whaling moratorium must be maintained, and we fully support it.
We believe that in addition to maintaining the moratorium on commercial whaling, the six fundamental elements we have outlined must also be included in any agreement that emerges from the IWCs meeting in Agadir. The six fundamental elements can be found on the websites of our respective organizations.
It is vital that the integrity of the moratorium be secured, and this week’s agreement with the six fundamental elements we are advocating would be a major step in this direction. Without the continuation of the moratorium there is no way a three quarters majority could be attained for an agreement in the IWC, and therefore the maintenance of the moratorium is unquestionable. While the moratorium remains in the schedule, the proposed package would create temporary exceptions to be determined for some species in some areas, and only for those governments that currently undertake commercial whaling.
Photo op’ & Latest news
From GREENPEACE, PEW AND WWF
Monday 21st June – 9h30 am
Outside the conference centre in Agadir
It’s hot in here!
We need to take the heat off the whales
Come and pick your Take the heat off the whales fan
and
Listen to a message from the Pew Environment Group, Greenpeace and WWF
Click here to download the pdf in English Cliquez ici pour télécharger la version en français
For more information: Pour toute information : Daniel KlotzPew +1 347-307-2866 Steve SmithGreenpeace +31 643 787 359 Ian MorrisonWWF +41 79 874 68 53 Kauro Narisawa (in Japanese) +81 80 65 58 44 46
Pew Seeks Landmark Conservation Solutions at
Historic International Whaling Commission Meeting
Washington – June 16, 2010
Listen to the recording of the Pew, Greenpeace and WWF Telepress Conference.
Efforts to finally bring an end to the impasse between pro-whaling and anti-whaling countries in the International Whaling Commission (IWC) will be the focus of the IWC’s Annual Meeting, opening in Agadir, Morocco, on Monday, June 21.
The “Save the Whales” campaign of the 1970s and 1980s mobilized governments and the public around the world behind the moratorium on commercial whaling, which was enacted by the IWC in 1982 and implemented in 1986. Twenty-four years later, however, three countries—Japan, Norway and Iceland—continue to kill whales for commercial purposes. Japan hunts under the guise of “scientific whaling,” and Norway and Iceland have filed official objections that allow them to ignore the moratorium.
In 2007, the IWC launched a process to find consensus between diametrically opposed views of whale conservation and whaling among its member states. That process is expected to end at this 62nd meeting of the IWC. It is unclear what direction the Commission will take: whether it will agree on a way forward that will improve long-term whale conservation, continue with the status quo or worse.
Joint Statement by Greenpeace, Pew and WWF:
Six Fundamental Elements for the Proposed IWC Consensus Decision
12 May 2010
Introduction:
We, the undersigned organizations, note that the Proposed Consensus Decision to Improve the Conservation of Whales from the Chair and Vice-Chair of the International Whaling Commission (IWC)(1) has been tabled to “stimulate the necessary intense discussion and negotiations prior to [the IWC annual meeting in] Agadir”(2) (in the Chair’s and Vice-Chair’s own words).
We agree with the Chair and Vice-Chair that “clearly a great deal more work is required” and that “the text in the present document […] represent[s] a starting point for further discussions and negotiations rather than a firm proposal.”(3)
We note the proposal in the Chair’s and Vice-Chair’s package that the moratorium on commercial whaling be retained (page 5, bullet point 1). But we share concerns expressed about exemptions to the moratorium contained in the proposal.
With this in mind, we have identified a list of six fundamental elements that are essential for inclusion in the final decision if the outcome of the Future of the IWC process(4) is to be successful at the IWC annual meeting in Agadir.
With only five weeks remaining before the annual meeting of the International Whaling Commission (IWC), we urge all IWC contracting governments to increase their efforts to ensure a successful outcome.
Submission by the Pew Environment Group on the “IWC Proposed Consensus Decision to Improve the Conservation of Whales"
Washington- 26 April, 2010
The Pew Environment Group welcomes the following aspects of the “Proposed Consensus Decision to Improve the Conservation of Whales” tabled by the Chair and Vice-Chair of the IWC on 22 April, 2010(1):
all whaling would be brought under international oversight and control (including significant improvements in the international compliance and observer scheme);
unilateral so-called scientific whaling under special permits now taking place would be eliminated, and the current abuse of ICRW Article VIII would end;
the number of whaling countries would be restricted;
the international trade in whale meat and other whale products would be ended, by restricting consumption to domestic markets, thus removing an incentive for an expansion of commercial whaling by exporting countries;
the broader reform of the IWC would be begun, to start to bring it in line with best practice in contemporary international environmental law;
the IWC would address the full range of the many and significant threats to whales from human activities; and
a South Atlantic Whale Sanctuary would be created;
Pew Says Adjusted Compromise on Whaling Falls Short; Previously Agreed Sanctuary Must Be Respected
Washington – 22 April, 2010
Susan Lieberman, director of international policy for the Pew Environment Group, issued the following statement in response to the proposal released today by the Chair (Cristian Maquieira of Chile) and Vice-Chair (Anthony Liverpool, Antigua and Barbuda) of the International Whaling Commission (IWC). The proposal will be considered at the IWC's annual meeting this June, in Agadir, Morocco.
“The negotiations on the future of the IWC have moved forward with many potential benefits, but unacceptable provisions remain. The draft compromise would allow whaling by Japan in the waters surrounding Antarctica to continue. The safe haven of the IWC-declared Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary – and the IWC’s moratorium on commercial whaling – should be set in stone, not set aside.
The Pew Environment Group welcomes the potential in the Support Group’s proposal for:
all whaling to be brought under international oversight and control (including significant improvements in the international compliance and observer scheme);
eliminating unilateral scientific whaling under so-called special permits (to start to put an end to the abuse of ICRW Article VIII);
the creation of a South Atlantic Whale Sanctuary; and
the focus on addressing the full range of the many and significant threats to whales from human activities.
To fully secure the future for healthy whale populations across the oceans, it is imperative that all of the following elements are included in further deliberations on this matter, and in any final package for consideration:
Pew Statement by the Pew Environment Group to the IWC Small Working Group, St Petersburg, Florida
3 March 2010
“Thank you very much for the opportunity to address the Commission today. I am speaking on behalf of the Pew Environment Group.
We appreciate the hard work and efforts of the members of the Support Group, and recognize that there are some positive elements within the document, including:
The potential for all whaling to be brought under international oversight and control, including significant improvements in the international compliance and observer scheme;
The potential for elimination of unilateral scientific whaling under so-called special permits, to start to put an end to the abuse of Article VIII;
The proposed expansion of the Southern Ocean Sanctuary to include the boundaries of the proposed South Atlantic Ocean Sanctuary;
The proposal to restrict whaling to the three countries currently engaged in this practice, without prejudice to on-going aboriginal subsistence whaling; and
The proposed focus on external environmental threats to whales.
Pew says proposed IWC compromise fails to secure a future for whales
Washington – 22 February, 2010
Susan Lieberman, director of international policy for the Pew Environment Group, issued the following statement today in response to recent efforts to resolve the impasse at the International Whaling Commission.
“The proposed compromise released today by the International Whaling Commission (IWC) fails to respect both the IWC’s 1994 declaration of the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary as well as the IWC’s 28-year-old moratorium on commercial whaling. However, it contains many positive elements for whale conservation that finally bring the IWC into the 21st century.
“The Southern Ocean – the environmentally sensitive waters around Antarctica – must be respected as off-limits to any whaling today as well as 10 years from now. We are disappointed that the proposed compromise issued today validates Japanese whaling in the Southern Ocean.